|
Doctors Are The
Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing 250,000 Deaths Every
Year |
|
This article in the Journal of the
American Medical Association (JAMA) is the best article I have ever
seen written in the published literature documenting the tragedy of
the traditional medical paradigm.
This information is a follow-up of the
Institute
of Medicine report which hit the papers in December of last year,
but the data was hard to reference as it was not in peer-reviewed
journal. Now it is published in JAMA which is the most widely
circulated medical periodical in the world.
The author is Dr. Barbara Starfield
of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health and she
desribes how the US health care system may contribute to poor health.
ALL THESE ARE DEATHS PER YEAR:
-
12,000 -- unnecessary surgery 8
-
7,000 -- medication errors in
hospitals 9
-
20,000 -- other errors in
hospitals 10
-
80,000 -- infections in
hospitals 10
-
106,000
-- non-error, negative effects of drugs 2
These total to 250,000
deaths per year from iatrogenic causes!!
What does the word iatrogenic mean?
This term is defined as induced in a patient by a physician's
activity, manner, or therapy. Used especially of a complication of
treatment.
Dr. Starfield offers several warnings
in interpreting these numbers:
-
First, most of the data are
derived from studies in hospitalized patients.
-
Second, these estimates are for
deaths only and do not include negative effects that are
associated with disability or discomfort.
-
Third, the estimates of death due
to error are lower than those in the IOM report.1
If the higher estimates are used, the
deaths due to iatrogenic causes would range from 230,000 to 284,000.
In any case, 225,000 deaths per year constitutes the third leading
cause of death in the United States, after deaths from heart disease
and cancer. Even if these figures are overestimated, there is a wide
margin between these numbers of deaths and the next leading cause of
death (cerebrovascular disease).
Another analysis concluded that
between 4% and 18% of consecutive patients experience negative effects
in outpatient settings,with:
-
116 million extra physician visits
-
77 million extra prescriptions
-
17 million emergency department
visits
-
8 million hospitalizations
-
3 million long-term admissions
-
199,000 additional deaths
-
$77 billion in extra costs
The high cost of the health care
system is considered to be a deficit, but seems to be tolerated under
the assumption that better health results from more expensive care.
However, evidence from a few studies
indicates that as many as 20% to 30% of patients receive inappropriate
care.
An estimated 44,000 to 98,000 among
them die each year as a result of medical errors.2
This might be tolerated if it
resulted in better health, but does it? Of 13 countries in a recent
comparison,3,4
the United States ranks an average of 12th (second from the bottom)
for 16 available health indicators. More specifically, the ranking of
the US on several indicators was:
-
13th (last) for low-birth-weight
percentages
-
13th for neonatal mortality and
infant mortality overall 14
-
11th for postneonatal mortality
-
13th for years of potential life
lost (excluding external causes)
-
11th for life expectancy at 1 year
for females, 12th for males
-
10th for life expectancy at 15
years for females, 12th for males
-
10th for life expectancy at 40
years for females, 9th for males
-
7th for life expectancy at 65
years for females, 7th for males
-
3rd for life expectancy at 80
years for females, 3rd for males
-
10th for age-adjusted mortality
The poor performance of the US was
recently confirmed by a World Health Organization study, which used
different data and ranked the United States as 15th among 25
industrialized countries.
There is a perception that the
American public "behaves badly" by smoking, drinking, and
perpetrating violence." However the data does not support this
assertion.
-
The proportion of females who
smoke ranges from 14% in Japan to 41% in Denmark; in the United
States, it is 24% (fifth best). For males, the range is from 26%
in Sweden to 61% in Japan; it is 28% in the United States (third
best).
-
The US ranks fifth best for
alcoholic beverage consumption.
-
The US has relatively low
consumption of animal fats (fifth lowest in men aged 55-64 years
in 20 industrialized countries) and the third lowest mean
cholesterol concentrations among men aged 50 to 70 years among 13
industrialized countries.
These estimates of death due to error
are lower than those in a recent Institutes of Medicine report, and if
the higher estimates are used, the deaths due to iatrogenic causes
would range from 230,000 to 284,000.
Even at the lower estimate of 225,000
deaths per year, this constitutes the third leading cause of death in
the US, following heart disease and cancer.
Lack of technology is certainly not a
contributing factor to the US's low ranking.
-
Among 29 countries, the United
States is second only to Japan in the availability of magnetic
resonance imaging units and computed tomography scanners per
million population. 17
-
Japan, however, ranks highest on
health, whereas the US ranks among the lowest.
-
It is possible that the high use
of technology in Japan is limited to diagnostic technology not
matched by high rates of treatment, whereas in the US, high use of
diagnostic technology may be linked to more treatment.
-
Supporting this possibility are
data showing that the number of employees per bed (full-time
equivalents) in the United States is highest among the countries
ranked, whereas they are very low in Japan, far lower than can be
accounted for by the common practice of having family members
rather than hospital staff provide the amenities of hospital care.
Journal
American Medical Association
2000 Jul 26;284(4):483-5
|
References
1. Schuster
M, McGlynn E, Brook R. How good is the quality of health care in the United
States?
Milbank
Q. 1998;76:517-563.
2. Kohn L, ed, Corrigan J, ed, Donaldson M, ed. To Err Is Human: Building a
Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
3. Starfield
B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York,
NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
4. World
Health Report 2000. Available at: http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/report.htm.
Accessed June 28, 2000.
5. Kunst A.
Cross-national Comparisons of Socioeconomic Differences in Mortality.
Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus University; 1997.
6. Law M,
Wald N. Why heart disease mortality is low in France: the time lag
explanation. BMJ. 1999;313:1471-1480.
7. Starfield
B. Evaluating the State Children's Health Insurance Program: critical
considerations.
Annu
Rev Public Health. 2000;21:569-585.
8. Leape
L.Unecessarsary surgery. Annu
Rev Public Health. 1992;13:363-383.
9. Phillips D, Christenfeld N, Glynn L. Increase in US medication-error
deaths between 1983 and 1993.
Lancet. 1998;351:643-644.
10. Lazarou
J, Pomeranz B, Corey P. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized
patients. JAMA.
1998;279:1200-1205.
11. Weingart
SN, Wilson RM, Gibberd RW, Harrison B. Epidemiology and medical error.
BMJ. 2000;320:774-777.
12. Wilkinson R. Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality. London,
England: Routledge; 1996.
13. Evans R,
Roos N. What is right about the Canadian health system? Milbank
Q. 1999;77:393-399.
14. Guyer B, Hoyert D, Martin J, Ventura S, MacDorman M, Strobino D. Annual
summary of vital statistics1998. Pediatrics.
1999;104:1229-1246.
15. Harrold LR, Field TS, Gurwitz JH. Knowledge, patterns of care, and
outcomes of care for generalists and specialists.
J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:499-511.
16. Donahoe MT. Comparing generalist and specialty care: discrepancies,
deficiencies, and excesses. Arch
Intern Med. 1998;158:1596-1607.
17. Anderson
G, Poullier J-P. Health Spending, Access, and Outcomes: Trends in
Industrialized Countries. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 1999.
18. Mold J,
Stein H. The cascade effect in the clinical care of patients. N
Engl J Med. 1986;314:512-514.
19. Shi L, Starfield B. Income inequality, primary care, and health
indicators. J
Fam Pract.1999;48:275-284.
|